How To See My Quantize Templates In Cubase 10

Cubase Groove Quantize Presets: WT?

---

I have searched for this topic for like 2 hours all over the internet, forums, manuals, you name it. NO JOY. I tin can't believe I can't find information on this.

Lets see if I can explain this right: This is a Cubase issue but I'll compare it to Logic where things happen... Logically... in Logic when y'all create a groove template it appears in the quantize menu with all the other grooves (like 1/xvi, 1/8 etc) Say you have a hi hat part you want to utilise as a groove for other instruments, like a shaker. Y'all can take that Hi Hat "groove" and employ it selectively to the shaker part. Now the shaker still has it'southward original groove, but it lines up ameliorate with the hats. In Logic, this groove is saved *with the project*. Makes sense to me. Why would you want that same Hello hat groove on every project y'all work on for the rest of time?

At present in Cubase I accept institute that this is not the example. Bizarrely, when y'all save a groove template in Cubase half-dozen, at least for me, it is actualization in the quantize bill of fare in all other projects. If I delete one, then go back to an earlier project, the groove quantize is GONE. This is completely crazy to me. Anyone know what is going and how for the beloved of Pete and Bob Marley God rest his soul I can have the quantize feature stay with the project and non be globally saved with the app?

Before anyone says and then: no I'1000 non going back to Logic, everything else is my set up is working perfectly fine which is why I'm just then surprised that this is happening... There is nothing anywhere almost this. Doesn't anyone else use this characteristic? I apply it all the time.

Hoping and praying someone out there knows what is going on and either what I'1000 doing incorrect OR a workaround....!

I was also wondering if anyone has fabricated a MIDI insert quantize part that is better than the stock Cubase i. Just curious.

Lives for gear

nope that'southward how it works and thats how I like information technology tbh...however if you accept tons of quantize templates, renaming etc becomes a huge hurting in the donkey every bit yous accept to roll down to the rename etc function which is at the lesser of it all..... however what I wish it did do was save the electric current selected quantize template for each projection selected in each project.
rsp

Wow, that's crazy. I call back it used to have folders as well doesn't seem to have that anymore - and so at least you could put grooves into folders and name the folders with projects. But not fifty-fifty that. What'southward going on? - That's just crazy. How are y'all supposed to accept hundreds of projects, and all the grooves from all the projects are all globally saved with the app? I tin can't believe information technology! I'd express mirth if it wasn't such a pain.

What if you lot open a project from 3 years ago, and some of the parts there were dependent on the quantize office based on a groove that has since been deleted? now your whole track is screwed up - or y'all have to observe what you based the groove on, and re quantize those bits?? Basics.

I can't believe it.

edit: no boldness to the fact you like information technology - simply that happens to be a really important feature for some people that they apply a lot. Just unreal......

Lives for gear

they all are all actually stored in i file ram_preset.pxml or something like that.. if y'all use quantize templates ofttimes like I do, I would definitely recommend keeping several copies of that file as it does get corrupted fairly oft and you will lose your quantize templates.....
why would you delete templates? I have never washed that... and accept been doing midi since 1988 or so.... I transferred all my studio vision pro templates and all the same take and use them..this isn't a new way information technology works and tbh this if the beginning time I have e'er seen a complaint about it such as yours (that it is global) and I do spend a lot of fourth dimension on their forums (been using nuendo since 2002).
sorry
rsp

Lives for gear

what to me would be nice would exist for it to permit the end user to easily make subfolders and motility them effectually so yous can categorise them as y'all like them..merely personally and I estimate SB developers as well don't meet a trouble with all of them being stored globally.
rsp

Yeah, well thank you for your replies. I likewise tin't detect anyone else complaining near information technology. I mean like I said, Logic stores it with the project, non globally. To me that makes perfect sense... Even meliorate would be both - existence able to store sure grooves in a global "folder" in the preset menu, and have others just exist "local" or per project. If yous always want to make a local preset global, just open that project and re-create it over to the global folder.

Thanks for the tip most that file. That at least gives me some promise of keeping track of it. Maybe I can find the lost version in fourth dimension automobile.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mike11 ➡️

I mean like I said, Logic stores it with the projection, not globally.

That has drawbacks too, if y'all utilise the same presets on different projects.

Lives for gear

Quote:

Originally Posted by mike11 ➡️

Aye, well cheers for your replies. I likewise can't discover anyone else lament nearly it. I mean like I said, Logic stores information technology with the projection, non globally. To me that makes perfect sense... Even better would be both - being able to store certain grooves in a global "folder" in the preset menu, and have others simply exist "local" or per project. If you e'er want to brand a local preset global, just open that project and copy it over to the global folder.

Thanks for the tip virtually that file. That at to the lowest degree gives me some hope of keeping track of it. Maybe I can observe the lost version in fourth dimension car.

proficient luck.
rsp

Lives for gear

Quote:

Originally Posted by PaPi61 ➡️

That has drawbacks too, if you use the same presets on different projects.

which is what I do for like genres many times.

rsp

Ha that's funny, that'due south what I NEVER do. I don't desire the same groove on a unlike vocal... But yeah you probably have your reasons for that, no dubiety - non criticizing - but I didn't retrieve anyone would want to practice that. I stand corrected...

Lives for gear

ok, then I am curious now....y'all are working on a vocal...and you lot decide to quantize parts of it....where practise you get the quantize template to apply say on the get-go rails you are going to quantize in that product?
rsp

From another track. Doesn't anybody else do this?

Instance: yous get a hello hat part perfect. It'southward a neat 16th rhythm and you accept a shaker part y'all have that is also good, but not quite in time with the hats. Then you decide to use the hats every bit a tempalte for the shaker. You use the lid part equally a template, then apply it at fourscore% to the shakers, The shakers even so have their original groove, simply now they sync much better with the hats, and you haven't killed anything with over quantizing and it's all based on real playing.

Another idea is you have a drum office played in past a drummer, and you lot have an electronic loop that sounds great under the shell but has a different groove. Y'all tin can take a midi slice of the drum part, and utilise that as a quantize template to apply to the groove to make it line upward with the pulsate office. The great thing is you lot could take the unabridged pulsate role from start to cease of a project, and line upward a groove with it, and so it doesn't have to be a "groove". That mode the loop volition ever follow the drummer. Or you could do the reverse, yous could iteratively quantize the pulsate part to the groove, and so that it was say 80% of the mode there, keeping the feel and imperfections of the original drum performance, but lining information technology upwards better with a groove.

No?

Lives for gear

no.. many of united states use pre-existing quantize templates and iterative quantize for instance on our tracks....are you a drummer per chance? For example I adopt to use a quantize template from a drummer (whether I have bought the quantize template, it came with the program or I sometimes employ a drum loop rails from stylus RMX as the basis for my quantize template) and use that as my basis...or if it is more electronic music use an MPC template equally my initial groove template for that project...I am always fascinated by different ppl's work flows..... why I asked.....

rsp

Lives for gear

also do you think the 16th note groove you lot mention as an instance is unlike whatsoever other groove you yourself have done before in some other project?
rsp

Ok, well I can run across your betoken at present. But I don't work that way - I don't similar using ready fabricated grooves even for iterative quantizing, I like to brand the groove myself, then use that to line up roughly the rest of the function - even using a department of one function on other sections of that aforementioned part. Or lining up other parts of the same department, if y'all follow what I mean.

To reply your question is the 16th like any other part, yes and no, if you want to be to say absolutely never, of course I tin can't say that, but practically the answer is no - every song is dissimilar, every feel is different, and then I don't desire to become using grooves - feels - from other tracks / parts - I'd rather it be original and fit with the song and functioning I'm working on.

I'm keys only also a drummer.

But it as well applies to things like string sections. If yous piece of work in sections similar I do, I might have six parts of a string department all playing various staccato parts, information technology'southward pretty difficult to get them to all line upward perfectly for a whole performance. You might get the first section say a viola divis down perfectly - the feel and timing is peachy, perchance right a note or two, or replay a section, but you finally become it right. You can now glue it together, grab the whole department and apply that whole part as a groove quantize. Adjacent you do the violins, you play it as best you tin, fix it upwards, etc, then add together 20% iterative quantize from the viola role, which is your base to tie them together. Now they sound like they're playing together.

You tin't do that by quantizing both of them to 1/16th groove! Plus a lot of string parts for example take a long attack, so to get the hitting of the note on the beat of the music y'all are really playing preemptively by a few ms. So if y'all quantize, and then you have to add track filibuster. And now you're opening a can of worms called pandora... Best to keep it musical but apply that musicality to line upward the other parts.

That's my thoughts on it anyway.

Anyhow, I run into and respect your fashion of working. It comes down a lot to the style of music, and what works for others. But I gauge my conclusion is that they actually *really* need to have information technology work both means, and should not exist expensive or complex to implement. Simply have a binder in the quantize menu. If you put a preset into the Project folder of the quantize preset menu, it stays only with the project, if you lot put information technology into a binder say named "Global" then it stays with the app, and is bachelor in all projects. If y'all have a preset in a project that you lot later on want to be in the global folder, you just open up that projection, and re-create information technology to the global binder, and it now appears in all other apps.

Tell me if I'm crazy only is that not a groovy idea. Complimentary Steinberg. Simply get it done and then I tin can use information technology haha

Lives for gear

:-) If you take used Cubase for a bit, y'all may take realised that Steinberg seems to be stubborn in their ways..... Simply yous are right, choices can't hurt..I too use one track sometimes to be the quantize source for some other, but in one case you don't save that quantize template it will somewhen not show up (once you use any other rail as parts to quantize or whatever information technology is called) and I gauge if you ever need it over again, you lot can reuse the same original track part in that projection y'all used to quantize the other tracks and re do the process....
take care and njoy the holidays...
rsp

Lives for gear

Hey Guys,

Does anyone know how to exercise this in 7.five I import the midi file, then select advanced quantize> Create groove quantize preset - Merely every time it overwrites the last one I did leaving me with one custom groove template.

Thank you

Lives for gear

Some follow up questions

1: When saved these set a name that shows tempo and fourth dimension signature, does this mean information technology can be only practical to tracks in that tempo etc? Im guessing no as that would be pretty useless?

ii: Is there a way to create folders for the quantize drop-down menu in 7.v. its a little overloaded at present and id like to categorize.

Lives for gear

Quote:

Originally Posted by zvenx ➡️

nope that'south how it works and thats how I like it tbh...yet if you have tons of quantize templates, renaming etc becomes a huge pain in the ass as you have to scroll down to the rename etc part which is at the bottom of information technology all..... however what I wish it did practise was save the current selected quantize template for each projection selected in each project.
rsp

Wow totally concord that was a long painful procedure I put in a feauture asking y'all should exercise so as well if you havent already.

Gear Maniac

And then does it change in Cubase Pro 8???

I would like to import / or create my own groove templates and put in folder like in Pro Tools. Then I will have folders similar Cubase grooves, MPC grooves, Logic grooves etc.

Gear Maniac

Lives for gear

Quote:

Originally Posted by TonyR ➡️

Crash-land

Non as of all the same go on putting in feature asking.

How To See My Quantize Templates In Cubase 10,

Source: https://gearspace.com/board/music-computers/680892-cubase-groove-quantize-presets-wt.html

Posted by: fungunpleted.blogspot.com

Share this post